Political Science Review using Qualitative Methods and Implications

Political Science Review using Qualitative Methods and Implications

This paper reviews a qualitative method of political science involving a large population. The study will also discuss current insights in comparative methods and case studies. Recent developments of qualitative methodologies for causal analysis have provided important insights into case study and comparative methods in political science. This study demonstrates that recent advances in analysis of small populations are generalizable and offer political science scholars and students the opportunity to develop solid research strategies and designs.

Bill Greenwood

Barnhurst, K. (2011). The new “media affect” and the crisis of representation for political communication. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 579–593.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms.’ New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6(2), 205–253.
Mendrika, V., D. Darmawan, T.S. Anjanarko, Jahroni, M. Shaleh, & B. Handayani. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Work from Home (WFH) Program during the Covid-19 Pandemic, Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 44-46.
Pooley, J., & Katz, E. (2008). Further notes on why American sociology abandoned mass communication research. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 767–786.
Powers, M. (2014). The structural organization of NGO publicity work: Explaining divergent publicity strategies at humanitarian and human rights organizations. International Journal of Communication, 8, 90–107.

Greenwood, B. 2021. Political Science Review using Qualitative Methods and Implications, International Journal of Work Innovation, 2(4), 328-342.